My dear observer,

I am highly amused that you appear to be more "worked up" than me. Your argument sounds incoherent and delirious to me. Are you well? If you need some reminding, your 1st tag was posted in response to the survey entry—you did have a target. Although you did not name him/her, I don’t see how different that is from actually naming the person. The damage was still done.

To you, it may seem like a “trivial, nebulous” issue, and that, to me, just goes to show how very selfish you are. I’m sure you never thought about how the person involved would feel with your spiteful words. Do consider the feelings of others, and imagine if it had been you. Feelings are not a trivial thing.

(By the way, you yourself acknowledged that this whole affair is “nebulous”, which essentially means lacking in definite content. Do think thrice next time before creating a scene out of such insignificant issues.)

While there is some truth in that some of us may have sounded a little harsh in our tag responses, I hope you’ll understand that we did it out of concern and protectiveness for our friend. (As much as we could just ignore your tag and let it pass, we felt compelled to defend our friend’s position, particularly so when our friend was kindly doing the job of organizing the event.) I’m sure your friends would do the same for you had you been in such situations.

There, I’ve said my piece. Once again, I urge you to be more understanding, and hope that the angst in you would not hinder you from having a merry Christmas ahead (:

P.S: It’s not very wise to end off an argument with “FAT THINGS”, isn’t it?

Mei Hui